This open letter to federal judge Kent Dawspn was submitted by a member of Judge Dawson's Mormon Stake of The Chirch of Christ of Latter Day Saints.

Judge Dawson,
You have complained you are getting a lot of death threats due to the Schiff trial. For clarity's sake let me make this crystal clear up front. THIS LETTER DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY SUCH THREAT!
However, there are numerous things that you, Mr. Schiff, over five million citizens and I know are true.
For simplicities sake the aforementioned group will be styled WE in the remainder of this letter.To begin with WE know the following points are true,
1. There is no law requiring the filing of or payment of the income tax by citizens residing in the United States.
2. The Secretary of State has never delegated his authority to the Commissioner of the IRS.
3. IRS agents physically alter (counterfeit) the "Notice of Levy"
document to con banks, employers and others into giving them citizen's money.
4. That in the CHEEK v. UNITED STATES, 498 U.S. 192 (1991) decision the court clearly requires the Government to prove that the law imposed a duty on the defendant.
5. That the IRS has been illegally stealing ALL of Mr. Schiff's Social Security for over seven years.

Although WE know it is not necessary to explain the above to you, in the *footnote area of this letter I go into gJreat detail regarding all five (5) points.
While WE know the above five points are undeniably true which proves Mr. Schiff should have never been indicted, tried or convicted they pale in comparison to your colossal ultimate betrayal of your sworn duty. That being, the fact there is absolutely no reasonable excuse you could offer to explain why you, after all the testimony was in, allowed the jury to decide Mr. Schiff's guilt or innocence... After all, the entire case rested on whether in fact Mr. Schiff believed he had a duty to do anything in regards to income tax. How, in good conscience, can you deny that you did not know, not only beyond a reasonable doubt, but beyond ANY doubt that Mr. Schiff did not believe he had such a duty? In point of fact you are condemned by your own words during the trial. WE know this is true because of the countless times when you said that you disagreed with Mr. Schiff's conclusions about the laws and interpretation of written documents by saying such things as, "That is your interpretation, Mr. Schiff" or, "We disagree" or "You can believe what you want, Mr. Schiff, but."
Would any reasonable person listening to your remarks not believe that YOU believed Mr. Schiff believes everything he says regarding the income tax?
However, WE also know you have sat on the bench long enough to judge a person's demeanor and there is no way you did not know Mr. Schiff's sole reason for living is to prove his beliefs regarding the income tax are true. Have you ever seen another man so devoted to a cause as Mr. Schiff? If your powers of observations did not convince you of Mr. Schiff's beliefs then you have no business sitting on the bench of any court much less one that has the power to condemn a man to spend the rest of his life in jail.
Before I depart from this area I must explain that I believe in the separation of church and state but here the law requires us to know what you really believed. So, as a Christian I simply must ask, "Yes, you can lie to men about not believing Mr. Schiff and be believed but how do you lie to and hope to be believed by Jesus Christ?"
However, WE know, in the final analysis, it did not matter how much judicial misconduct you had to demonstrate because it was your goal (perhaps ordered to do so) to make sure Mr. Schiff was convicted. The only other reasonable explanation for your obvious uncontrolled bias is if you have a hatred for Jews, which as a member of the Mormon faith, I would hate to think was cultivated or condoned within The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
Have you considered the consequences of your actions to your family, the Mormon church and how history will portray you? I have no doubt in the future an attorney who has vast media connections such as Alan Dershowitz or Barry Scheck or an ambitious newspaper man like Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein will investigate and write a book revealing this government's conspiracy and its attempt to conceal that conspiracy by banning Mr. Schiff's book "The Federal Mafia" and illegally convicting him with the hope Mr. Schiff will die in jail prior to the endless appellate procedures have run their course and the gigantic part you played!
You may think that will never happen but history teaches otherwise. It is almost a certainty the day will come when Mr. Schiff will be hailed as a patriot who stood up to this government and in your courtroom asked you for justice but his one request of you, "SHOW ME THE LAW!" fell on deaf ears.
Then, as sonnets are written praising Mr. Schiff you will be vilified. All your relatives will change their last name to distance themselves from your disgusting stink. Because the Mormon Church has incorporated the Constitution as a part of its beliefs therein making it a holy doctrine you will be immediately shunned, and removed as President of the Henderson Stake. But your problems do not stop there because as your complicity in violating the Constitutional rights of Mr. Schiff are fully explored you will be excommunicated from the church and all references to your name will be stricken from all Mormon documents and our Fathers book in heaven...
When this all comes to pass, as it surly must, do you think those hidden powers in the government, who some people say control you, will stand up and admit their culpability? I think not. You may try to defend your misconduct during Mr. Schiff's trial by pointing out all the fair trials you conducted in the past. However, as the Nazi Judge Ernst Janning found out during his trial at Nuremburg "As a judge you are not judged by the times you were fair it is the one time you violate your oath and are unjust you are judged on." Therefore, you should, as all good little Nazis judges who were ONLY FOLLOWING ORDERS were, be hung in effigy, all alone with only your hate and thoughts of revenge to comfort you.

In closing, I'm sure the millions of citizens who will read this and I want to know when your immortal soul leaves this earth and you are facing all the Latter Day Saints, Jesus Christ and the Lord thy God how will you answer the question, "Why did you, the President of the Henderson Stake, sell your soul to Caesar for a pound of gold?"
John, chapter 8
44: Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

SO IT IS WRITTEN. SO IT SHALL BE DONE!
A Christian and protector of The Constitution.

*While there are countless other areas I could point out where you clearly demonstrated judicial misconduct I will limit my discussion to these five points.
Point 1. How, with a straight face, could you tell that jury that it was the intent of congress that a citizen needs to find and combine completely separate areas of the tax code in order to know (be informed) they are required by law to file and pay the income tax? In that regard, if what you say is true, then how could this conjured up, pieced together law not be Void for Vagueness?
Point 2. In your jury instructions close scrutiny reveals you deceived that jury into believing you were telling them the Secretary of the Treasury delegated his authority to the Commissioner of the IRS! However, you actually said no such thing. Your exact words were, "The actual task of collecting the taxes, however, has been delegated to local IRS directors." WE know that "delegating a task" is not the same as delegating the authority to do a task. You continue (in pertinent part) with, "District directors in turn are authorized to redelegate the levy power." While it may be true that the District Directors could redelegate such authority, if it was ever delegated to them you never said the Secretary made such a delegation so it was a moot and deceptive point. The point being, why would you not just say "The Secretary delegated his authority to the IRS"! WE know the reason you did not say, "The Secretary delegated his authority to the IRS!" was because you know no such delegation was ever made because it was never published in the Federal Register which is required to have the force and effect of law.
Point 3. The "Notice of Levy" has NOT been assigned an OMB number which is required under 44 USC 3512(b). The IRS agents remove the pertinent part, "Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee or elected official of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia," Therefore, the "Notice of Levy" only deals with federal employees and, it gives no "instructions" to anyone to do anything! It is only a "Notice. But, by removing that part those IRS agents deceive the recipient into thinking it deals with ordinary citizens. And because the IRS agents alter, change, doctor up, counterfeit it then at best it is invalid and at worst a criminal activity. In fact, if such an altered (counterfeited) federal document is mailed WE know that violates the law. Which WE also know compels you, as a Federal Judge, to take notice of and direct the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute all such violations of the law even though they were perpetrated by IRS agents. WE also know to intentionally ignore any violation of the law which strips any citizen of their Constitutional rights violates your sworn oath as a Federal Judge and subjects you to being removed from the bench.
Point 4. Of all your judicial misconduct during Mr. Schiff's trial this one is the most blatant disregard of the rights of the defendants. WE know that the judge is NOT a member of the prosecution team and his sworn oath of office and a member of the bar forbids him to act or appear to act in consort with the prosecution to deprive any defendant of his rights under the law or to obtain a fair trial. WE also know the Supreme Court made it clear in the Cheek decision it is the duty of the prosecution, NOT THE JUDGE, to prove that the law imposed a duty on the defendant.While you may consider you are a part of the "government" mentioned in the Cheek decision WE know that is not true. After all, WE know you do not believe the congress or the Supreme Court think, said, or meant to infer it is a citizen duty to seek out and obtain an audience with a particular federal judge named Kent J. Dawson to find out if the law imposed a duty on the citizens! Which, in this case would have been necessary because when asked by countless citizens neither any IRS agent, their supervisors, the Commissioner of the IRS, any attorney or prosecutor nor any federal judge, other than yourself, could produce such a law that imposed a duty on the citizens!
Point 5. An IRS agent testified, under oath, in your court, that he had been taking all of Mr. Schiff's Social Security checks for over seven years and yet when Mr. Schiff produced the law that only allowed that IRS agent to legally take fifteen percent (15%) of those checks you sat there and did nothing about it. In fact, it appeared that amused you! WE know when you intentionally ignore any violation of the law which strips any citizen of their Constitutional right to due process you violate your sworn oath as a Federal Judge.